The law has been around for a very long time, and much of the law is based on precedents and previous cases to interpret today`s law. This is called stare decisis (defined below). This means that much of the legal language used today was used hundreds of years ago and why many legal terms seem outdated and old. While this gives it some charm, it can be confusing and discouraging for people who don`t know the language of the law. As discussed in this article, legal language serves a useful function and is not necessarily bad. However, there is a time and a place for legal language. For example, the correct use of legal language in contract drafting can help the document gain clarity and precision when read by someone with legal training. But what if it is a text that is not intended for this audience? It is not uncommon for lawyers and other jurists to assume that laymen are familiar with these terms and use them with this assumption. This can make the law intimidating and confusing. Previous A previous case that raises similar legal issues and facts to the present case, which will be helpful in determining the outcome of this case. Some types of precedents are binding, which means that the precedent not only helps decide the case, but the court must apply and follow the precedent. Legal language continues to be used, in part because it saves time. It can be difficult to fully explain a complicated legal concept while being brief.
If you`ve ever seen The Simpsons, you may remember Bart Simpson yelling about force majeure used to describe unforeseen circumstances that prevent someone from performing a contract. There`s a lot more to the concept than that, and lawyers know it, and all that complexity can essentially be reduced and condensed into two Latin words. Some joke that lawyers use legal language so they can charge higher fees. While this is not entirely true, as mentioned above, there may be some truth to this. Just as a physician needs to know a lot about technical terms when diagnosing and treating patients, lawyers also need to know the language of the law to do their job effectively. This is partly why clients pay legal fees. Clients hire trained and qualified lawyers to help them navigate their legal questions and documents. Lawyers should switch between legal language and simply explain those legal terms to someone who is not in the law, and the big ones know when to use them. Part of the reason why legal language may seem so unknown to a layman is that a word or phrase may have a very specific meaning in law that is completely different when used outside of it. When common words are used, it can be confusing to know in what context the word or phrase is used. For example, we can often use discovery and damage in our daily lives, but these words have a more specific meaning when it comes to the law. We do not intend for GM to buy this plant, there are lawyers who position it that way, but that is nobody`s intention.
Stare decisis In Latin, it means “to stick to things decided.” This refers to the principle that, if cases are similar, a precedent set by a higher court must be followed by a lower court or a court of equal rank. For example, the District Court and the High Court must follow the jurisprudence of the Court of Appeal. However, the Court of Appeal, as Singapore`s highest court, is not bound by its own precedents. The use of legal language also allows for some precision, as law students and lawyers need to know the specific and precise meaning of each of these legal terms and everything associated with them. Another way to look at it is that it ensures consistency. Lawyers or lawyers are less likely to misunderstand each other if they understand a legal term that they use consistently. The employees of the airline have been given much more power and have become police officers in the sky since 9/11, I think many abuse this authority. Most of your company rights and policies – even if you are entitled to compensation for your inconvenience – are listed in the Conditions of Carriage, which can be found on an airline`s website. Long terms are filled with jargon and legal language, although it`s always helpful to take a look at them to understand the basics. Here are the main reasons why an airline may bump into you or make it difficult for you to travel: 1. The airline underestimated the tickets for this flight. If an airline detects through its electronic reservation system that a non-stop flight is booked too quickly, it could indicate that ticket prices are too cheap.
In such a case, your flight could change from a non-stop flight to a connecting flight. 2. The air marshal needs your seat. Because air marshals protect the public, they sometimes sit first class without notice. If one of them shows up and needs your seat, you can be pushed, assigned to another seat or placed on the next available flight. And you won`t even get an explanation; The government does not want you to complain about a marshal on board. 3. The carrier leaves the itinerary. Consolidation within the industry has led some airlines to reduce the number of flights available. Some, like Allegiant Air and Frontier, have also abandoned routes that are no longer profitable. An airline should be required to put you on another airline for the price you pay, Hobica says. But this is not the case.
Legal terms can be extremely confusing to laymen, but lawyers seem to use them on a whim. Every law student needs to learn this, so they learn it during their years in law school, use it daily in their professional life, and may not even realize they`re using it. These legal terms are legal. While some believe that legal language can confuse and alienate their clients and laymen, there are others who remain strong advocates. Force majeure In French, it means “force majeure”. This is a type of clause in a contract that releases the parties from their contractual obligations when an unforeseeable and extraordinary event occurs, so that the performance of the contract is either impossible or fundamentally different from what the parties originally foresaw.